I am writing to urge rejection of the proposed amendments to the Reed College Alumni Association’s Constitution.
See the statement of opponents: https://reedalumni.blogspot.com/2018/12/statement-of-opponents-to-proposed.html
-
Amending a Constitution is a major step which should not be undertaken
absent compelling evidence that the existing document is hopelessly
flawed. The proponents of the changes have not presented such evidence.
-
The major effect of the proposed Constitutional changes would be the
anti-democratic disenfranchisement of the Chapters. Disenfranchisement
would be the result of reducing Chapter representation on the Alumni
Board. Further, overworked Chapter heads would become members of a
separate Chapters Committee - a new layer of bureaucracy.
-
Adoption of the proposed changes would result in a significant
diminution of alumni control over the Alumni Association. Fewer Chapter
member seats on the AB would mean fewer grass roots alumni would be able
to serve on the Alumni Board. Control of the Alumni Association would
become even more concentrated in the hands of the Executive Committee - a
self-appointed minority answerable only to themselves.
I urge rejection of the ill-advised and anti-democratic proposed changes in the Reed College Alumni Association’s Constitution.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This blog will carry the views of Reed College alumni who believe that the proposal by the existing leadership of the Reed College Alumni As...
-
Here is the current list of authors and signers (as of January 18): ...
-
This blog will carry the views of Reed College alumni who believe that the proposal by the existing leadership of the Reed College Alumni As...
-
Back in September of 2017, when the proposal to cut the chapters out of full representation on the Alumni Board was first put forward, there...
No comments:
Post a Comment